analytical commentary

If things go this way, in the end it becomes a contest between equals — none of them really stand out.

Real confidence and empty bluster are two different things.

Hemingway's prose was bad writing.

This issue is a collision between the egos of idols and the egos of otaku.

Actually, bringing huge piles of materials is a cheap tactic to prevent any counter-argument.

It's certainly true that leadership by force and intimidation has its drawbacks.

Leadership by intimidation doesn't produce the kind of results we're seeing right now.

Second, the literacy rate in Europe at the time was low.

Comparing a dog's sense of hearing to a human's, it's vastly superior.

Normal people don't need 3D or high-speed whatever, you know.

Whatever the organization, internal harmony and unity are crucial factors determining its success or failure.

Well, broadly speaking, it's not wrong.

It isn't entirely clear which side wanted it.

That much goes without saying.

The thing itself is a cause for celebration, but there was one comment that caught my attention.

However, it's going to become necessary to factor in other things as well.

On the surface, most of this book is a record of how a series of cases evolved.

What appears on the surface is merely the tip of the iceberg.

Of course, there are many variations between these two extremes.

And then the other one drew a doubtful conclusion.

There are several superficial reasons.